One of the greatest tricks the illuminati has played on humanity is to have removed the concept of a living God from the minds of men who, deprived of a sense of their origin and purpose, have descended into a materialistic and nihilistic worldview disconnected from their creator, entranced by wizardry and subject to the dominion of monsters. The triumph of scientific rationality, which we now know to have been based upon a lie, has dispensed with the belief in, or role of, God in human affairs and the destiny of this realm. On his Godless earth mankind drifts without relevance or purpose thinking himself liberated to follow his basest instincts free from accountability or judgement beyond the narrow world of material things.
“God is dead. God remained dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives; who will wipe the blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?
“Neither a person nor a nation can exist without some higher idea. And there is only one higher idea on earth, and it is the idea of the immortality of the human soul, for all other “higher” ideas of life by which humans might live derive from that idea alone.”
In their desperation to find belief systems to embrace men have allowed themselves to be degraded into the adoption and perpetuation of absurdities which have been so carefully prepared…their rage, apathy and despair are nurtured and weaponized as the they are guided towards the worship of self and material things.
“Your people never realize that we offer them only worthless baubles that cannot bring fulfillment. They procure one and consume it and are not filled. We present another. We have an infinite number of outward distractions, to the extent that life cannot again turn inward to find it`s definite fulfillment. You have become addicted to our medicine through which we have become your absolute masters.”
Atheism and Nihilism are encouraged because they weaken the will and morality of the citizen whilst creating a more individualistic and less cohesive society which is then less able to withstand exploitation by the amoral and immoral parasites who are continually seeking to exploit the inherent weaknesses within any civilized society. Those who undermine faith are considered useful and so they are promoted and rewarded with wealth and fame for services rendered, often unwittingly, to the New World Order. The most celebrated atheist of the modern era is the biologist Richard Dawkins who was reputedly inspired to write his 2006 book “The God delusion” on the faulty assumption that Islamic extremism was responsible for the infamous 9/11 attacks. This book has sold more than three million copies and has been translated into 30 different languages and Dawkins has toured the world as a celebrity intellectual receiving accolades and endorsement to the extent that his name has become synonymous with wisdom and scientific knowledge. His rise to prominence is illustrative of the techniques which are used to steer public perception through the creation and maintenance of useful puppets who are often unaware of their complicity.
~ Dawkins was indoctrinated within an education system which moulded a worldview aligned with that of elitist interests.
~ His “career” as a promoter of secular atheism was predicated on his ability to express and promote a prescribed opinion with conviction and clarity; the support of Network-affiliated instruments then ensured his success.
~ What Dawkins considered to be “his” views were promoted through propaganda. His role was that of an authority figure entrusted with persuading the wider population that the concept of “God” was obsolete, harmful and unnecessary.
~ As an “asset” of the NWO Dawkins was pampered and protected whilst the public mind was trained to revere him as a brilliant thinker.
Dawkins is a man of great hubris and limited intellect who has embraced his mission with all the righteous fervour and zealotry befitting of the ideologically possessed religious fundamentalist. He, and others such as the American Sam Harris, are leading millions of their “followers” astray; By deriding faith as superstition, they are helping to remove the very pillars on which they so haughtily sit for the removal of religious values has the inevitable consequence of allowing a spiritual and moral decay to permeate throughout society. These promoted pseudo-intellectuals remain blind to the reality of this world and, like the ostrich with it’s head in the sand, remain oblivious to the dystopian nightmare which is unfolding around them.
Atheistic philosophy is based upon the belief that there is no evidence for the existence of God. Such a view negates the implausibility of creation arising from random nothingness and goes against intuition for mankind’s ability to contemplate his own being and the complexity and harmony of the natural world in which he lives are suggestive of an intelligently designed construct. To see the truth a man need only open his eyes. As Dawkins himself once admitted when referencing the possibility of seeding by “alien” civilizations…
“If you look at the details of biochemistry and molecular biology you might find a signature of some sort of designer; and that designer could well be a higher intelligence.”
As it is impossible for Dawkins to disprove the existence of God, so he concentrates his attention on identifying the flaws and contradictions within various religious belief systems…
“The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully”
Albert Pike expressed similar reservations…
“The Deity of the early Hebrews talked to Adam and Eve in the garden of delight, as he walked in it in the cool of the day; he conversed with the Kayin; he sat and ate with Abraham in his tent; that patriarch required a visible token, before he would believe in his positive promise; he permitted Abraham to expostulate with him, and to induce him to change his first determination in regard to Sodom; he wrestled with Jacob; he showed Moses his person, although not his face; he dictated the minutest police regulations and the dimensions of the tabernacle and its furniture, to the Israelites; he insisted on, and delighted in sacrifices and burnt offerings; he was angry, jealous and revengeful, as well as wavering and irresolute; he allowed Moses to reason him out of a fixed resolution utterly to destroy his people; he commanded the performance of the most shocking and hideous acts of cruelty and barbarity. He hardened the heart of Pharoh; he repented of the evil that he had said he would do unto the people of Nineveh; and he did it not, to the disgust and anger of Jonah.”
but he remained a man of faith…
“Such were the popular notions of the Deity; and either the priests had none better or took little trouble to correct these notions; or the popular intellect was not enlarged enough to enable them to entertain any higher conceptions of the Almighty.”
As Jordan Peterson has said of the bible…
“You start by treating the text with a certain amount of reverence and you (himself) with a certain amount of ignorance. There’s something here that you don’t understand, and you should probably assume that it’s worthwhile because it’s being kept, rather than to leap to the proposition that you and your ignorance can clearly see why it’s unnecessary.”
The mysteries of the Bible have been concealed within a series of layers which lie hidden beyond the surface literal interpretation.
“Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God; but unto men that are without, all these things are done in parables; that seeing, they may see and not perceive, and hearing they may hear and not understand….And the disciples came and said unto him “why speakest thou in parables.” He answered and said unto them, “Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.”
Gospels (Mark 4:11)
The complex and ambiguous nature of the bible has caused unceasing friction between competing ideologies which have been founded upon conflicting interpretations of a text of such ambiguity that it seems beyond human capability to agree upon a shared understanding. It seems both rational and logical to question the veracity of such a book especially when the doctrine within it appears to assign special privilege and stature to one ethnically defined group as there is an inherent motivation within ruling hierarchies to subvert and corrupt spirituality in order to serve their own interests.
“All human societies are based upon, and their continuity and growth reinforced by, the use of hope, fear and repetition. The structure is employed in every type of organization whether tribal, national, political, religious, recreational or other.”
The illuminati, as a ruling hierarchy has infiltrated all belief systems and attempts to control them in the same manner that it controls secular humanists. Whether in war, commerce or theology their favoured tactic is to rig the game by controlling two seemingly conflicting sides and when Dawkins seeks to refute doctrine, he is simply flailing at the straw men arguments that they have themselves helped to create. Being disconnected from God and finding man’s attempts to commune with the Almighty unsatisfactory does not, by any logical reasoning, mean that God does not exist.
“Lord our world seems divided between people who see everything as black or white and those who see everything as grey. Deliver me from both legalism and relativism- neither is wise. Give me the humility and discernment that is necessary for having a wise heart.”
Dawkins error was not to doubt God, it was to assume that God does not exist, form a dogmatic opinion and then actively promote this personal subjective judgement when he had neither the maturity nor understanding to talk publicly on such profound questions. He has widely promoted the naive and dangerous assumption that societies which dispense with faith and govern through scientific rationale will make greater progress whilst having an enhanced sense of morality. The idea that removing the concept of a divine creator from the minds of men will allow an individual and social morality to develop on a mutually agreeable ethical foundation is a delusional folly which has been intentionally instilled into Western societies as a prelude to their planned dissolution for there is nothing which could be further from the truth. Shared belief systems are a consequence of social evolution which have allowed civilizations to develop and prosper and societies that dispensed with reverence to the metaphysical have repeatedly degenerated into a literal hell upon this earth. In this age of deceit the myriad of conspiracies are made possible only as a direct consequence of the widespread loss of faith in self, humanity and God.
“What is certain, even for science and the reason, is the idea of God is the grandest, the most holy, and the most useful of all the aspirations of man; that upon this belief morality reposes, with its eternal sanction. This belief, then, is in humanity, the most real phenomena of being; and if it were false, nature would affirm the absurd; nothingness would give form to life, and God would at the same time be and not be….Without a belief in Him, life is miserable, the world is dark, the universe disrobed of its splendours, the intellectual tie to nature broken, the charm of existence dissolved, the great hope of being lost; and the mind, like a star struck from its sphere, wanders through the infinite desert of its conceptions, without attraction, tendency, destiny, or end….Reason is at fault when it deals with the infinite. There we must revere and believe. Notwithstanding the calamities of the virtuous, the miseries of the deserving, the prosperity of tyrants and the murder of martyrs, we must believe there is a wise, just, merciful, and loving God, an intelligence and a providence, supreme over all, and caring for the minutest things and events. A faith is a necessity to man. Woe to him who believes nothing.”
Having rejected one religion, the impressionable young student Richard Dawkins was only too willing to embrace another. He became the public face of Scientism, that most corruptible and contemptible creed which is constructed around the same psychological weaknesses of the human mind which Dawkins is continually seeking to expose in others.
“Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye”
In his delusion he has accepted the faulty premise that what is loosely termed “science” wisely imparts unimpeachable knowledge for the betterment of the wider society when in reality the quality of scientific endeavour and the purposes with which it is used are but a reflection of the logical and ethical standards upon which it is founded and practiced.
BOOM! I AM A SCIENTIST!
Modern-day “scientists” are the refined products of a systematic educational process which has been intentionally designed to programme students into orthodoxy and obedience through the suppression of intellect and within their ranks are some of the most closed and indoctrinated minds that have ever spawned from the collective consciousness; a considerable portion of these people seem incapable of mastering even the most rudimentary aspects of logical thought. Scientism is their new religion, a world in which the uninitiated are expected to uphold blind dogmatic faith in revered institutions whilst placidly accepting proclamations from the chosen priests – and woe to the heretic that would dare to question them!
Scientists have a tendency to react with petulance and derision when faced with the flat earth conspiracy because this revelation undermines the psychological foundations of their entire belief system, destroys their most venerated idols and exposes their own gullible stupidity for slavishly accepting and repeating what is possibly the most absurd doctrine that the imagination of man has yet conceived. Rather than address the numerous and pertinent questions relating to the shape of the earth, Dawkins, like all officially endorsed “scientists” simply assumes they are mistaken and dismisses the existence of such inconvenient people with contemptuous derision.
“I’ve often marveled at the motivation of morons like this (flat earth proponents) and here we have a clue. (referring to a BBC article) It’s the feeling of community, of warm fellowship with like-minded inhabitants of the echo-chamber. No doubt the same factor is at work in less obviously absurd delusions.”
The “absurd delusions” are not defined or addressed because they cannot be refuted. The emporer has no clothes; the evidence does not really exist and the “scientist” cannot admit this to himself (let alone anybody else) so resorts to obfuscation, abuse and mockery. The wisdom of the fool must eventually prevail and these words could have been written for Richard Dawkins and his kind…
“How long will you who are simple love your simple ways? How long will mockers delight in mockery and fools hate knowledge”
These mockers prove it is not mental capacity but attitude that determines whether we become (perceived as) wise or foolish. At the root of mockers character is a high pride that hates submitting to anyone. Their strategy is to debunk anything, acting very smug and knowing in the process. Mockers, though fools, appear to most eyes as worldly-wise and highly sophisticated…The mocker wears a perpetual sneer. His talent for cutting insults and invective looks like intellectual sophistication. Behind the mask of witticisms, however, is a vastly inflated confidence in his own opinion and intelligence.”
None of these compartmentalized zealots have “studied” the shape of the earth at all; they have simply accepted the world as it was presented to them and having considerable emotional investment to protect will instinctively defend their worldview when it is called into question.
“If your intellectual territory is a particular idea you are going to tend to contradict any ideas that contradict that. The stronger the ideas are, the stronger your resistance is going to be”
This negation of reality is an extreme example of a collective psychosis which has been caused by a contagious mind virus commonly referred to as “cognitive dissonance” in which the human mind will deny the truth and lie to itself thereby greatly hindering the search for collective understanding.
“Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that does not fit in with the core belief”
This failing is indicative of a severe retardation of the intellect and is fundamental to understanding the predicament of the human condition. It is present, to some extent, within every human mind.
Albert Pike said…“We are all of us, though not equally, mistaken. The cherished dogmas of each of us are not, as we freely suppose, the pure truth of God; but simply our own special form of error, our guesses at truth, the refracted and fragmentary rays of light that have fallen upon our minds”
“There is a water plant, on whose broad leaves the drops of water roll about without uniting, like drops of mercury. So, arguments on points of faith, in politics or religion, roll over the surface of the mind. An argument that convinces one mind has no effect on another. Few intellects, or souls that are the negations of intellect, have any logical power or capacity. There is a singular obliquity in the human mind that makes the false logic more effective than the true with nine-tenths of those who are regarded as men of intellect. Even among the judges, not one in ten can argue logically. Each mind sees the truth, distorted through it’s own medium. Truth, to most men, is like matter in a spheroidal state. Like a drop of cold water on the surface of a red-hot metal plate, it dances, trembles, and spins, and never comes into contact with it; and the mind may be plunged into truth, as the hand moistened with sulphurous acid may into molten metal, and be not even warmed by the immersion”.
Unfortunately for the short-term psychological wellbeing of many within the scientific community the evidence for a level earth is not simply strong, it is irrefutable. The properties of a substance shall always conform to known physical laws and no amount of contorted mental gymnastics can redefine reality; bodies of water, which must be contained, shall always seek to find and maintain their level regardless of how vehemently it is protested otherwise.
The promotion and endorsement of “science” and the simplistic and generalized manner with which the word is used is an intentional subterfuge for it allows what is subjective and conjectured to be concealed amidst the objective and the empirical and thereby be validated by association. Such sleight of hand allows falsified and misrepresented information to be presented as factually true and for objectors to be defined and condemned as “anti-scientific” by servile scientific, political and media establishments working in conjunction with affiliated corporate and financial institutions.
This process inevitably incentivizes the funding of scientific “research” by vested interests (or their front organizations) which then further corrupts scientists, institutions and educational establishments thereby creating a perverse demand for the indoctrinated, the immoral and the simple-minded to fill positions of influence; it also creates a situation where the most powerful corporations on earth have a mutual interest in promoting and protecting the equity of the “science” brand name as anything labelled as “scientific” will immediately become eligible for political, media and public endorsement.
“Scientists have discovered that people will believe anything when you say that scientists have discovered it”
Theoretical science, soft science and pseudoscience are all unprovable sciences giving claims, beliefs and theories which are widely accepted despite not adhering to the testable, observable and repeatable criteria of the scientific method. Scientism is a faith which has, in large part, been created, encouraged and sustained for the base motive of widespread profiteering which must now be considered in serious jeopardy for scientists are now seeing for themselves the pervasive corruption and dissolution within their respective fields.
Science has created a fanciful and imaginary perception of this shared reality. Fraudulent science and invalid reasoning permeate throughout cosmology, geology, archaeology and paleontology which have all formulated and perpetuated all manner of fantastical theories which are neither verifiable nor falsifiable and have no basis in empirical science. Dawkins is a proven hypocrite for he has continually asserted that belief which is not based on evidence is one of the world’s great evils whilst endorsing and promoting a belief system which is incapable of demonstrating claims and is intolerant to those that would challenge it’s often baseless assertions.
“What they seek is the oxygen of respectability, to engage would be to “give them oxygen by the mere act of engaging with them at all.”
The scientific conspiracies are shocking both in terms of their scale and implications. There is an allegory, attributed to Pythagoras, which now seems highly prophetic…
“Speak not about Pyhtoric concerns without light”
Meaning that it is ill-advised to attempt the interpretation of the mysteries of God and the sciences without spiritual and intellectual illumination.
Revel in the mystery
It is hard to conceive of a flat earth without being drawn to the conclusion that we are living on a designed construct and that our lives have purpose and accountability. Whoever, or whatever, has created this ingenious deception has successfully concealed the true nature of this reality from the people of this world.
Many people of the Christian faith think that the revelation of the flat earth validates their religious beliefs as it directly contradicts the claims of contemporary science and seems to relate with biblical text.
~ “The world also shall be stable, that it cannot be moved.” (The earth is a ball hurtling chaotically through the universe)
~ “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (The “big bang” theory; everything evolved from nothing)
~ “And God said, “let there be lights in the firmament” (The earth revolves around the sun and the stars are trillions of miles away)
~ “For I am fearfully and wonderfully made” (Evolution came from a primordial soup)
~ “And God made the firmament and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament.” (There is no firmament and there are no waters above the earth)
~ “And God made the two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night.” (The moon is not an independent light source)
~ “And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness” (First came the sun, and only then the light)
The globe lie is commonly perceived as a satanic lie. The speed that the earth is claimed to revolve around the sun (66,600 mph) , the supposed 23.4 degree tilt of the earth’s axis (inversion 66.6 degrees) and the curvature of the earth (8 inches being .666 of a foot) are not thought to be coincidental by many Christians who are now referring to the globe lie deception as “occult science.”
Although the exposure of widespread scientific fraud and spiritual deception appears to validate the Christian faith it cannot be assumed that the bible must therefore be the proven word of God for it could be postulated that the same conspiracy which implanted the ball earth into the minds of men could also have written the bible. The inherent danger within organized religion is that nations and empires can become involved in war, bloodshed and the oppression of others often on the pretext of acting according to the will of God; even minor differences within the interpretation of suppositions on existential questions within the belief systems of societies can, and do, lead to all manner of atrocities…
“He commands us to love one another, to love our neighbour as ourself; and we dispute and wrangle, and hate and slay each other; because we cannot be of one opinion as to the Essence of his nature as to His attributes; whether He became man born of a woman, and was crucified; whether the Holy Ghost is of the same substance with the father, or only of a similar substance; whether a feeble old man is God’s vicegerent; whether some are elected from all eternity to be saved, and others to be condemned and punished; whether the punishment of the wicked after death is to be eternal; whether this doctrine or the other be heresy or truth,- drenching the world with blood, depopulating realms, and turning fertile lands into deserts; until, for religious war, persecution and bloodshed, the Earth for many a century has rolled around the sun, a charcoal house, steaming and reeking with human gore, the blood of brother slain by brother for opinion’s sake, that has soaked into and polluted all her veins, and made her a horror for her sisters in the universe.” Albert Pike
Manly P Hall once wrote….
“Eventually, however, man will learn that he need never be ashamed of truth. Until he does learn this, he is false to his God, to his world and to himself.”
That time is surely at hand for if mankind can only mature and examine existence from the foundation of spiritual grounding and logical training then the mysteries of this earth may be revealed to him. It should then be possible to know, rather than believe, that God exists without forming prejudice against those who do not share an identical perception of the divine essence and will. Until this happens it seems wise to avoid intransigent and dogmatic belief systems, whether they be defined as scientific or religious, and to instead keep an open mind whilst reveling in the mystery of uncertainty as no man can claim to know who we are, where we came from or why we are here.
“But when the jar open’s itself, it becomes unlimited, it contains the waters of the river… so open now your mind, your heart and your life. For it is only the open vessel and an open heart that can contain the infinity of God; open your mind, your heart and your life to that which you don’t yet know, that you might contain that which is greater than yourself.”
A mind freed through the waking of consciousness can transcend from the dull prison of materialistic thought and regain sentience and communion with the divine; Christian theology refers to such spiritual rebirth as being “born again.” This being the lighting of the divine spark which must surely reside within us all.
Richard Dawkins once found himself on a public stage with the American “astrophysicist” Neil De Grasse Dyson. They were discussing life within their imaginary universe and Dawkins had been struggling with the concept of an “event horizon” which, like much within the bizarre world of modern astronomy, requires great feats of mental gymnastics to assimilate. Dawkins asked for an explanation to this phenomena; De Grasse responded with flair and verbiage but did not relay any meaningful information. Dawkins was not satisfied with the response and asked him again. De Grasse smiled and kept his composure, but he still did not properly address the question.
Dawkins intuition understood that the person he was talking to was prevaricating and insincere and the divine spark flickered within. He wanted to ask the question again but to do so for a third time could have been construed as confrontational and not in keeping with the occasion, so he paused, and the moment was gone. With a resigned expression the biologist acknowledged that these matters were outwith his specialized field and it was surely not his place to question the words of such a renowned physicist as De Grasse Tyson; with some relief Dawkins moved conversation to more comfortable subjects and the crisis was averted although he will undoubtedly be just as confused about those supposedly distant galaxies now as he was then. For a brief moment the omnipresent divine that is referred to as “God” appeared to manifest within the writer of “the god delusion” himself, a somewhat comical if tragic irony.
There is tragedy and hope to be found if divinity can be found manifesting within such minds as Richard Dawkins; the greater theological question is whether the source of the expansion of consciousness is internal or external from the human body. Given that the nature of ourselves and of this world is so far removed from our ability to comprehend it, it is then logical to approach this question from a position of humility and subservience and to deduce that as sentient beings it is probable that divine power comes from that which is infinitely greater than ourselves. The earth is, in many respects, a dangerous and hostile environment both physically and spiritually and it could therefore be postulated that this is a place of learning or punishment. There is good reason to surmise that humanity is shortly going to be made aware of the nature of this existence because mankind will surely not be permitted to exist if he cannot learn to evolve. The earth is a level plain and whomever or whatever has been responsible for it’s creation is hardly likely to be well-disposed to what has been going on here; furthermore the levels of degeneracy and destruction are such that it seems probable that there will be some form of intervention to restore order, for humanity appears to have lost the ability to order itself.