Speaking of America’s entry into two world wars, Henry Kissinger says that…
“Both presidents were prepared to put their country’s military forces in harm’s way and to respond should harm indeed befall them, as was likely. In each case, the ultimate decision to enter the war was based on considerations which went far beyond the immediate incidents”
The same ruthless realpolitik was used in 1964 when American politicians were seeking justification to expand the Vietnamese conflict.
“Those of us in intelligence, not to mention President Lyndon Johnson, Defence Secretary Robert McNamara and National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy, all knew full well that the evidence of any armed attack on the evening of August 4th, the so-called Tonkin Gulf incident, was highly dubious. But it fit the president’s purposes, so they lent a hand to facilitate escalation of the war.” Ray McGovern
It has since been admitted that the alleged attack never took place and the Gulf of Tonkin has become known as a classic example of what is referred to as a “false flag” operation. In naval warfare a “false flag” is an attack where a vessel flies a flag other than their true battle ensign when engaging an enemy; the term is used to define a staged or engineered incident to be falsely blamed on a third party which is then itself deemed deserving of attack, a tactic which has been employed repeatedly to persuade civilian populations of the moral justification for pre-planned wars of aggression.
~ The Gleiwitz incident. A covert German attack on a German radio station preceding the invasion of Poland 1939.
~The Mukden incident. Japanese troops dynamited a railway near Mukden, blamed the attack on Chinese dissidents and then occupied Manchuria.
~ The Russian apartment bombings. High-rise apartment buildings were repeatedly targeted in a series of bombings which spread fear throughout Russia and killed over 300 people, state involvement being indicated by the arrest of FSB agents caught after further devices were planted at Ryazan. Vladmir Putin was to order air attacks in “retaliation” and the Second Chechen War began shortly thereafter.
Supposed “allies” can also, on occasion, use ruthless and nefarious tactics to further their political objectives….
~ The Lavon affair. An Israeli covert operation in which Egyptian Jews were recruited to plant bombs inside American, British and Egyptian owned cinemas and libraries, the attacks to be blamed on the Muslim brotherhood to persuade Britain to keep troops within the Suez Canal zone.
~The USS Liberty. A sustained Israeli land and air attack on an American spy ship which resulted in the deaths of 34 crew members with a further 171 being injured. The intention was to sink the vessel and blame it on the Egyptians; subsequently released transcripts have revealed it was not, as was claimed, a case of “mistaken identity”.
The American government openly admits that officials at the highest levels of military command were planning a series of “False Flag” operations in 1962 as a precursor to their planned invasion Cuba…
“As requested by Chief of Operations, Cuba project, the Joint Chiefs of Staff are to indicate brief but precise description of pretexts which they consider would provide justification for US military intervention in Cuba…all projects are suggested within the time frame of the next few months. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner…. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight”
“Included in the nations the Joint Chiefs suggested as targets for covert attacks were Jamaica and Trinidad-Tobago. Since both were members of the British Commonwealth, the Joint Chiefs hoped that by secretly attacking them and then falsely blaming Cuba, the United States could incite the people of the United Kingdom into supporting a war against Castro.” Cuba Project
Such subterfuge relies on the ignorance of the public and the vast majority of military and government personnel; conspiracies then, as now, are possible because of the compartmentalized nature of institutions.
“If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it should be one in which participation by U.S personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation.” Dept of Defence Report
Western Governments have repeatedly allowed and precipitated the killing of citizens, both foreign and domestic, in order to further their political objectives.
The CIA undermined European governments in the post-war years by creating armed groups which facilitated coups and carried out terrorist attacks in order to provide a pretext for reactionary measures against undesirable political elements. This programme was called Operation Gladio and it involved clandestine forces conducting unorthodox warfare under NATO command….
“The secret armies were equipped by the CIA and the MI6 with machine guns, explosives, munitions and high-tech communication equipment…. Leading officers of the secret network trained together with the US Green Berets… and the British SAS Special forces…The secret armies, as the secondary sources now available suggest, were involved in a whole series of terrorist operations and human rights violations that they wrongly blamed on the Communists in order to discredit the left at the polls. The operations were always aimed at spreading maximum fear among the population and ranged from bomb massacres in trains and market squares (Italy), the use of systematic torture of opponents of the regime (Turkey), the support for right-wing coup d’etats (Greece and Turkey), to the smashing of opposition groups (Portugal and Spain.)”
Vincent Vinciguerra, an admitted terrorist, stated that all the outrages in Italy (one killed eighty-five people) originated within the national security apparatus of the country and specifically with its relationship to NATO.
“You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple…to force these people…to turn to the state to ask for greater security. This is the political logic that lies behind all the massacres and the bombings which remain unpunished, because the State cannot convict itself responsible for what happened”
Operation Gladio was publicly admitted by a former head of the Italian secret service and by a serving Prime Minister. According to a 2000 Senate report…
“Those massacres, those bombs. those military actions had been organized or promoted or supported by men inside Italian state institutions and, as has been discovered more recently, by men linked to the structures of United States Intelligence”
Operation Gladio forces are also said to have been behind the Greek military coup of 1967, three years after Lyndon Johnson issued the following warning to the Greek ambassador…
“If your Prime Minister gives me talk about democracy, parliament and constitution, he, his parliament and his constitution may not last very long”
When the dictatorial regime seized power they quickly targeted “undesirable elements” within the civilian population….
“In the space of some five hours, over 10,000 people were arrested by military squads according to detailed files and planning, and were taken to “reception centres”….Most of those who were arrested in the first hours after the coup were later moved to police and army cells. Communists, Socialists, artists, academics, journalists, students, politically active women, priests, including their friends and families were tortured”
Of the twenty countries directly affected by Operation Gladio, only three have conducted parliamentary investigations and the European Union’s response has been limited to one of verbal condemnation.
The CIA has essentially been a criminal organization from its very inception when it cooperated with the Corsican mafia in setting up the “French Connection” to import heroin into the United States. The agency has continued to facilitate the drug trade ever since whilst acting as a clandestine army tasked with installing national governments which are beholden and subservient to the interests of corporate power and wherever there is resistance to this power the agency will employ Government terrorism to achieve its objectives. This has resulted in the widespread use of terror, torture and assassination throughout the Americas, Africa, the Middle East and Southeast Asia where some of the world’s most brutal and corrupt regimes have come to power through the funds, weapons and expertise provided through the CIA.
Government terrorism is compartmentalized within the military, intelligence and security apparatus of the state and its use is not confined to foreign intervention; it is being increasingly directed internally as part of an agenda to manage and control the domestic population through propaganda and legislation. The malign influence of the Central Intelligence Agency was almost certainly behind the assassination of John F Kennedy in 1963 and the intervening years have seen a marked increase in the corruption and subservience within bureaucratic institutions which could potentially restrain its activities. The agency has embedded its operatives within mainstream media and newspaper outlets which are legally permitted to use propaganda targeted towards a domestic audience following amendments to the 1948 Smith-Mundt act; even the definition of a “conspiracy theorist” is their creation, the purpose being to create and deride a generalized term which is then used to categorize and discredit those that challenge official narratives whilst distracting attention away from the specific information which is being questioned. Many people remain dismissive, and even abusive towards “conspiracy theorists”, blinded by a basic propaganda technique which has been used effectively and repetitively by masters of propaganda.
“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false” William Casey CIA
By 2001 everything was in place; the civilian population had been rendered sufficiently malleable whilst their institutions had effectively become “instruments” of a Network which had been controlling the world from behind the facade of “American” power for decades. The immediate objectives of this “Network” had already been outlined by PNAC (Project for the New American Century) whose stated goal was “to promote American leadership” and to “shape a new century favourable to American principles and interests” by challenging “regimes hostile to our interests and values”, further advocating that America prepare for fighting “multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars” and participated in “constabular duties associated with shaping the security environment.” These “constabular duties” were also to be directed against the civilian populations of the Western “democracies” as the perpetual state of conflict against “terrorism” would necessitate a massive expansion in state legislature which would enable governments to impose an increasingly authoritarian rule upon citizens at the behest of the Network. To achieve these objectives foreign and domestic would require the greatest known “false flag” in the history of mankind: 9/11.
9/11: Taking terrorism to the homeland
“Furthering the process of transformation even if it brings revolutionary change is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event- like a new Pearl Harbour”
Dov Zakheim (Pentagon/Council of Foreign Relations)
By 2019 over 3,000 experts in structural engineering, architectural design, science of materials, science of construction, fire protection, metallurgy and demolition had signed a petition calling for a new enquiry into the events of 9/11. They claim that it is scientifically impossible for the twin towers and World Trade Centre 7 to have collapsed as a result of aircraft impact in conjunction with fire damage and it is their professional opinion that the buildings were taken down by controlled demolition. What conceivable motive could there be for so many qualified professionals to expose themselves in this manner other than for a heartfelt desire to tell the truth?
Richard Gage of the American Institute of Architects and founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth introducing the 1912 documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence-Experts speak out…
“According to official government reports, the fires weakened the structural steel framing of both twin towers leading to sudden, progressive and total collapses. Unknown to most people, a third steel frame high-rise, World Trade Centre 7, was also destroyed. Critical questions have been raised by more than 1,500 architects and engineers about the official explanations for the destruction of all three of these buildings. Along with more than 10,000 concerned individuals, these professionals, collectively comprising more than 25,000 years of experience have signed our petition. They are calling for a new investigation into the destruction of these three WTC high-rises. This call is based on evidence that reveals a very different destruction scenario than reported by government engineers”. As coherent sets of scientific facts are brought into focus by the experts, the data and the witnesses in this film, you will come to a much greater understanding of the events of 9/11 and will be in a position to draw your own informed conclusions”
The “smoking gun” for the 9/11 false flag operation is WTC 7, a 567ft skyscraper which collapsed several hours after the second of the twin towers was destroyed. This building had not been hit by an aircraft and fell, according to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (N.I.S.T) report, as a result of its structural integrity being compromised as a result of office fires. This explanation is, according to the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth, a demonstrable lie…
~ Prior to 9/11 no steel framed high-rise building had ever collapsed as a result of fire.
~ For over two seconds the building fell at freefall velocity which could only occur if the supporting columns had suffered a simultaneous failure as buildings undergoing structural collapse do not have zero resistance.
~ The building fell symmetrically. It is impossible for asymmetrical damage to cause a symmetrical collapse.
~ The building fell in the manner of controlled demolition which was immediately apparent to demolition experts such as Danny Jovenko…
“This is controlled demolition” … Q. Absolutely? “Absolutely. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job, done by a team of experts.”
Emergency responders were evacuating the streets around WTC 7 prior to its collapse and talk of its impending demise were soon in circulation…Live BBC coverage featured the following exchange with WTC 7 still visibly standing behind the reporter!
Anchor: “Jane, what more can you tell us about the Solomon brothers (WTC 7) building that’s collapsed.”
Reporter: “Well only really what you already know, details are very, very sketchy. As you can see behind me, the trade centre appears to be still burning, we see these huge clouds of smoke and ash and we know that behind that there’s an empty piece of what was a very familiar New York skyline.”
The architects and engineers for 9/11 truth also claim that controlled demolition is the only possible cause for the collapse of WTC 1 and 2. They claim that…
~ Neither the aircraft impact nor the resulting fire could have caused structural damage severe enough to endanger the buildings collapse.
~ As with WTC 7, both the manner and speed of the initial and subsequent phases of the collapse were indicative of the interior columns being simultaneously compromised.
~ The buildings could not have fallen at the speed they did in accordance with the official story as this would have defied known physical laws.
~ Both the physical and visible evidence of ejecta during collapse and the complete pulverization of concrete, office furnishings and human beings cannot be explained without the use of powerful explosive force.
That whole thing looks nothing like a building falling down, it’s a building being blown up, that’s what the physics shows” David Chandler
~ Visible “squibs” seen as the buildings collapsed and the diagonal cuts visible on the steel supports are indicative of controlled demolition as are the testimonies of explosions which were recorded from more than 100 first responders who reported hearing sounds of explosions and flashes of light at the onset of the destruction of both towers.
~The extreme temperatures which created molten concrete and melted steel suggest the use of powerful incendiary devices.
Most of the aviation fuel vaporized in the initial explosion and the ensuing fires were never hot enough to melt, or even soften the supporting steel columns of the buildings.
“The media portrayed these fires as being extremely hot, but the fires were not that hot in WTC1 and 2. If you look at NIST’S own data you can see this, and to use our own powers of observation you could tell by seeing these fires and seeing black smoke come out the windows, that means the fires were oxygen starved and it was incomplete combustion and so it was a low temperature fire”
Edward Munyak (Fire safety expert)
“The heat from the fire supposedly softened the steel and thereby brought the buildings down. If you have a flame at 750 degrees, you can hold that flame under a steel beam forever and you will never reach a high enough temperature to bend steel, let alone melt it, so immediately I knew, at that point, that the official explanation was dead wrong”
Robert Podosky (Physicist/Engineer)
An important omission from the NIST report was the testimonial and visual evidence of molten concrete and steel at ground zero in the days, and weeks, following 9/11. NIST had to deny such evidence as there was no explanation within their pre-conceived narrative; jet fuel and office fires are incapable of generating enough heat to melt steel.
“So, what is this molten metal? It’s a direct evidence for the use of thermite” Steven Jones (Physicist)
Thermite is a composition of metal powder which can be used as an incendiary, sustaining an extreme heat when ignited and reaching temperatures of over 4500 F which will liquify steel. The use of this material would explain why the localized temperatures at Ground Zero were still in excess of 1000 C a full week after the buildings had collapsed and why clean-up workers had to contend with conditions such as…
“Molten steel running down the channel rails, like you were in a foundry, like lava” Philip Ruvolo F.D.N.Y
The architects and engineers have studied, documented and presented their evidence with a thorough and diligent professionalism which has helped to expose the N.I.S.T report as baseless propaganda designed to simply affirm foregone conclusions. Their “investigation” disregarded inconvenient evidence and was negligent to the extent of not even testing for the presence of explosive residue.
Similar tactics of obfuscation and misinformation have been used to conceal the true fate of flight AA 77 which was allegedly flown by an inexperienced pilot in a descending corkscrew turn before conducting an extreme low-level attack at speeds greatly in excess of the Maximum Operating Velocity of the aircraft. Such claims prompted the formation of pilots for 9/11 truth, an organization of aviation professionals and pilots who understand that the story of this aircraft’s attack on the Pentagon is not credible; the alleged pilot had not even been permitted to fly solo in a Cessna 150. Commander Ralph Kolstad, a former fighter and commercial pilot and air flight instructor said…
“At the Pentagon the pilot of the Boeing 757 did quite a feat of flying. I have 6,000 hours of flight time in the Boeing 757 and 767 and could not have flown it the way the flight path was described.”
Other experienced aviators agreed with his assessment….
“I just can’t imagine an amateur even being able to come close to performing a maneuver of that nature”
“For a guy to just jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is impossible, there is not one chance in a thousand. To expect the alleged airplane to run these manoeuvres is simply ridiculous”
The consensus opinion is that the approach flightpath was beyond the capability of an amateur pilot and that the chosen trajectory was an illogical way to conduct an attack on the Pentagon due to the high risks of the pilot losing control of the aircraft and the airframe suffering structural failure.
The crash site at the Pentagon had no significant wreckage and the damage to the structure was incompatible with an airliner impact; one of the most surveilled buildings on earth had supposedly been struck by a Boeing 757 and yet the only video evidence made available for examination are two inconclusive frame sequences, one of which appears to have been doctored at the critical moment. Jim Miklaszewski was an NBC reporter at the Pentagon who testified to receiving the following friendly advice from a forewarned Pentagon official…
“This attack was so well coordinated, that if I were you, I would stay off the E ring (where the impact was to occur) where our NBC office was, the outer ring of the Pentagon for the rest of the day, because we’re next.”
The other plane involved in 9/11 is alleged to have crashed into a field in Pennsylvania following a struggle on the aircraft, but this account has been challenged because fragments of the aircraft were recovered from a debris field extending over several miles which is not compatible with the official version of the loss of flight UA 93. The scene of the impact did not resemble a crash site which perplexed responders, reporters and locals alike. The mayor of Shanksville Ernie Stuhl said…
“My brother-in-law and a friend of mine were amongst the first ones to arrive. They were standing in Shanksville on the corner of the street and their car was right there, and they were the first ones to arrive, even before the firefighters arrived. Everybody was rather dumbfounded because they had been sent to an airplane crash site and there is no airplane. No airplane… just that hole.”
The entire aircraft is supposed to have buried itself underground, leaving no visible trace of its existence with the FBI claiming to have recovered 95% of the wreckage (all subject to internal investigation) from a hole which seems to have had the ability to fill itself in. The mushroom cloud left by the explosion resembled a bomb blast and there was no evidence of the sustained black smoke which would have resulted from a jet fuel fire, much to the confusion of local reporter Jim Parsons….
“There’s a very strong odour, of…the scorched earth, it’s the only way I can describe it, it doesn’t smell like jet fuel, it smells like burned earth”
The official story of 9/11 is awash with such verifiably false information that it is becoming increasingly apparent to many Americans that their “government”, or elements within it, has perpetrated an act of terrorism which killed nearly 3,000 of their fellow citizens; the inhalation of hazardous dust has shortened the lives of thousands more, especially amongst first responders and those tasked with clearing the rubble in the aftermath of the event.
“We know we’ve been lied to about 9/11, we don’t know for sure who did it, we don’t know exactly how they did everything and that’s why we need a new investigation to find out. We do know there was a massive cover up, that there was evidence hidden and destroyed. The American people absolutely need the truth” Robert Bowman USAF (ret)
Extensive military exercises were in operation on the morning of 9/11 involving the air defence network of the country which was simulating an attack on the United States which included an attack by hijacked civilian airliners. These war games were to strip the Eastern seaboard of its defensive cover as the correlation between “exercise” and “real” scenarios created confusion throughout the chain of command, which was exacerbated by recent changes in personnel and breakdowns in communication; this being the reason that aircraft could fly unmolested in American airspace without interception. This combination of bad luck and incompetence was either an extraordinary coincidence or, more plausibly, a pre-planned cover for the operation using a modus operandi which has been employed repeatedly to conceal acts of Government terrorism.
“Staff exercises or command exercises are perfect for a rogue network which is forced to conduct its operations using the same communications and computer systems used by other officers who are not necessarily party to the illegal operation” Webster Tarpley
The crime scene was rapidly cleared of incriminating forensic evidence in contravention of both law and standard protocols of investigation; there followed the 9/11 commission which was, from its inception, delayed, underfunded and set up to fail. The “incompetence” within the military command was quietly ignored or rewarded as the governing administration, and their PNAC members, used the events of 9/11 to capitalize on their long-desired plans for the expansion of foreign and domestic control; unbeknownst to the general public plans had already been made to unleash the full might of American military power upon some of the most ancient cultures on the earth…
“Because I’d been through the Pentagon right after 9/11. About 10 days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, “Sir, you gotta come in, you’ve gotta come in and talk to me a second.” I said, “Well, you’re too busy.” He said “No, no.” He says, “We’ve made the decision, we’re going to war with Iraq.” This was on or about the 20th September. I said “We’re going to war with Iraq? Why?” He said, “I don’t know.” He said, “I guess they don’t know what else to do.” So, I said “Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda?”. He said “No, no.” He says, “There’s nothing new that way, they just made the decision to go to war with Iraq.” He said, “I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down governments.” And he said, “I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail.” So, I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He said, he reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs”- meaning the Secretary of Defence office- “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out 7 countries in 5 years”. Starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” General Wesley Clark
This is the reality of 9/11; a false flag operation used as a catalyst for overt pre-planned military aggression and justified as retaliation against a fictitious threat; a dramatic escalation of the Network’s use of the American “instrument” to further its stated objective for a New World Order.
“The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida, and any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the “devil” to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a “war” against terrorism Robin Cook
The “War on Terror” was also directed towards a domestic agenda. Media propaganda repetitively asserted that state intervention was required to defend the lives and freedoms of the civilian population from the threat of Islamic terrorism. This was a total inversion of the truth. The extensive infiltration within the political, military and intelligence establishments of the Western “democracies” would now be used to create and facilitate domestic terrorism (which it would then blame on external sources) with the intention of introducing an increasingly authoritarian system of governance for those residing in the “free” world. The Network has little choice; it must implement measures to suppress the truth and the ability of citizens to speak following the events of September 11th as what had previously been a largely covert power structure was forced, by the scale of its success and ambition, to reveal its existence to those in the world who were paying attention; the suppression of individual liberty and empowerment is in any case central to their concept of centralized population management.
On the 7th July 2005 three explosions on the London underground followed by another on a bus in Tavistock square claimed the lives of 52 people and injured over 700 more. This was an act of government terrorism which was, like the 9/11 attacks, committed under the cover of an “exercise”. The crisis management firm Visor consultants had chosen that exact time and location to conduct a mock terrorist drill (on behalf of an unnamed client) which involved the very scenario which was to occur. The operation did not go to plan however; the young men who were to be blamed for the attacks were making their way to London (presumably to participate in the “exercise”) only to find themselves delayed by unforeseen circumstances when their connecting train was cancelled. This act of providence exposed 7/7 as a False Flag because the trains which were to be attacked had already left Kings Cross railway station when the so-called terrorists arrived there. Unfortunately, the patsies were not able to escape and were probably killed by armed police shortly thereafter as suggested by a newsflash that morning which briefly mentioned that a report had come in that three terrorists had been shot dead at Canary Wharf. According to an article in the NZ Herald…
“A New Zealander working for Reuters in London says two colleagues witnessed the unconfirmed shooting by police of two apparent suicide bombers outside the HSBC tower at Canary Wharf. The New Zealander, who did not want to be named, said the killing of the two men wearing bombs happened at 10.30 on Thursday. Following the shooting, the 8,000 workers in the 44storey tower were told to stay away from the windows and remain in the building for at least six hours”
The public were told that home-made explosives had been used to attack the trains but this official account fails to acknowledge and does not explain why in the first week after the 7/7 terrorist attacks, intelligence officials, police officers and forensic scientists independently said that forensic examination had found traces of military-grade C4 plastic explosive at the London underground blast sites. A witness reported damage inconsistent with an internal explosion…
“The policeman said, “mind that hole, that’s where the bomb was”. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train.”
The incidence of domestic terror has risen dramatically since the false flag attacks of 9/11 and 7/7 and whenever there is a bombing or a shooting saturation media coverage is employed to present a story to the world in which the officially released information is often demonstrably inconsistent with the actual event. Government agencies have been staging, facilitating and perpetrating acts of terror against their civilian populations with increasing impunity enabled by all pervasive infiltration and corruption, near total control of information and a largely ignorant and apathetic target population; they have simply refined the methods used during “Operation Gladio” by using terror to manipulate civilian populations with their modus operandi being to use the cover of an exercise to conduct black operations. The psychological effect has been to create the perception of a perpetual “war” which has been used as justification for the pre-planned extension of state powers to police and surveil citizens whose freedom of movement, action, speech and thought is being continuously eroded under the guise of “protecting the public.” This process began within weeks of 9/11 with the signing of the “Patriot Act” which, in the opinion of many, had been carefully prepared prior to the supposed Al Qaeda attacks and was drafted with the intent to curtail the civil liberties of the domestic population. A civilian could now be searched and seized without warrant and detained indefinitely without charge whilst their property could be searched without consent or knowledge, their communications intercepted without warrant and their personal information made easily accessible. Similar legislation has been enacted throughout the “free” world in conjunction with a plethora of rules and regulations (some of which are dangerously subjective in their interpretation) to be enforced by a corporate and increasingly militarized police force.
The Network has also acquired the means to target the assets, liberties and lives of the civilian population through the manipulation of natural climactic forces; by using weather terrorism to depopulate areas and devalue real estate they are implementing plans such as UN Agendas 21 and 2030 whilst profiteering through insurance fraud and what is termed “disaster capitalism.” The effects of their actions are blamed upon another mythical “enemy” which they have themselves created; this being the “fight” against “global warming” which is now usually referred to as “man-made climate change.” This is brilliant propaganda but bears no relation to reality; the Network can, and does, use ionospheric manipulation and aerosol dissemination to control the weather.